Liver and COVID-19 - A Review and Clinical Approach

Liver enzyme abnormalities occur frequently in patients diagnosed with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been suggested that patients with severe acute liver injury are more likely to be admitted to intensive care, require intubation or renal replacement therapy and their mortality rate is higher than patients without severe acute liver injury. This review article explores the possible aetiologies of liver dysfunction seen in patients with COVID-19 and also the effect of COVID-19 on patients with pre-existing liver disease. Finally, we suggest clinical approaches to treating a patient with liver enzyme disturbance and COVID-19 and also caring for patients who require liver transplantation in the COVID-19 era.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

A Comprehensive Molecular and Clinical Investigation of Approved Anti-HCV Drugs Repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Glaring Gap between Benchside and Bedside Medicine.

The limited availability of effective treatment against SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major challenge in managing COVID-19. This scenario has augmented the need for repurposing anti-virals for COVID-19 mitigation. In this report, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of anti-HCV drugs such as daclatasvir (DCV) or ledipasvir (LDP) in combination with sofosbuvir (SOF) was evaluated. The binding mode and higher affinity of these molecules with RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 were apparent by computational analysis. In vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity depicted that SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP combination has IC50 of 1.8 and 2.0 µM, respectively, comparable to remdesivir, an approved drug for COVID-19. Furthermore, the clinical trial was conducted in 183 mild COVID-19 patients for 14 days to check the efficacy and safety of SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP compared to standard of care (SOC) in a parallel-group, hybrid, individually randomized, controlled clinical study. The primary outcomes of the study suggested no significant difference in negativity after 3, 7 and 14 days in both treatments. None of the patients displayed any worsening in the disease severity, and no mortality was observed in the study. Although, the post hoc exploratory analysis indicated significant normalization of the pulse rate showed in SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP treatment vs. SOC. The current study highlights the limitations of bench side models in predicting the clinical efficacy of drugs that are planned for repurposing.

Treating Children with Hcv Close to Home through a Virtual National Multidisciplinary Network

Background and Aims Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health problem in adults & children. The recent efficacy of Direct Acting Anti-viral therapy (DAA) has cure rates of 99% in adults and adolescents. These drugs were licensed for children 3-12 yrs during the recent coronavirus pandemic. To ensure equitable access, safe & convenient supply during lockdown, we established a virtual national treatment pathway for children with HCV in England & evaluated its feasibility, efficacy & treatment outcomes. Method A paediatric Multidisciplinary Team Operational Delivery Network (pMDT ODN), supported by NHS England (NHSE), was established with relevant paediatric specialists to provide a single point of contact for referrals & information. Referral & treatment protocols were agreed for HCV therapy approved by MHRA & EMA. On referral the pMDT ODN agreed the most appropriate DAA therapy based on clinical presentation & patient preferences, including ability to swallow tablets. Treatment was prescribed in association with the local paediatrician & pharmacist, without the need for children & families to travel to national centres. All children were eligible for NHS funded therapy;referral centres were approved by the pMDT ODN to dispense medication;funding was reimbursed via a national NHSE agreement. Demographic & clinical data, treatment outcomes & SVR 12 were collected. Feedback on feasibility & satisfaction on the pathway was sought from referrers. Results In the first 6 months, 34 children were referred;30- England;4 - Wales;median (range) age 10 (3.9 - 14.5) yrs;15M;19F: Most were genotype type 1 (17) & 3 (12);2 (1);4(4). Co-morbidities included: obesity (2);cardiac anomaly (1);Cystic Fibrosis (1);Juvenile Arthritis (1). No child had cirrhosis. DAA therapy prescribed: Harvoni (21);Epclusa (11);Maviret (2) .27/34 could swallow tablets;3/7 received training to swallow tablets;4/7 are awaiting release of granules.11/27 have completed treatment and cleared virus;of these 7/11 to date achieved SVR 12. 30 children requiring DAA granule formulation are awaiting referral and treatment. Referrers found the virtual process easy to access, valuing opportunity to discuss their patient's therapy with the MDT & many found it educational. There were difficulties in providing the medication through the local pharmacy. However there are manufacturing delays in providing granule formulations because suppliers focused on treatments for COVID, leading to delays in referring and treating children unable to swallow tablets. Conclusion The National HCV pMDT ODN delivers high quality treatment & equity of access for children & young people, 3- 18 yrs with HCV in England, ensuring they receive care close to home with 100% cure rates.

Reported safety of HCV direct-acting antivirals with opioids: 2017 to 2021

Background and aims: As a result of disengagement in addiction care during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a record increase in mortality associated with opioid overdoses (primarily fentanyl), particularly in North America. In the USA there were over 100, 000 overdose deaths in 2021, while over 2000 were recorded in the province of British Columbia. As we attempt to develop novel ways to increase HCV treatment following ≥30% declines during the pandemic, we evaluated publicly available adverse events (AEs) reports for opioids and DAAs to assess whether safety concerns from potential drug interactions arewarranted, particularly amongst those using fentanyl. Method: Data were downloaded from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. AEswith the DAAs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), sofosbuvir/ velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/ velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX), andelbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/ GZR) listed as the suspect product were analyzed with an initial received date from July 28, 2017-December 31, 2021, as were opioidassociated AEs for all 2017–2021. Subsequently, AEs were counted based on listed concomitant use of opioids (fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone), or overdose outcomes irrespective of concomitant opioid use. Data are descriptivewithout any statistical analyses. Results: In the reporting period, 40 total AEs were recorded with concomitant DAA and fentanyl use, 14 resulting in death (G/p = 3, SOF/VEL = 11;Table 1);626 total AEs were recorded with concomitant DAA and oxycodone or hydrocodone use, 28 resulting in death. Separately, overdose events were reported 196 times, 32 resulting in death. The number of overdoses declined each year from 2018 (N = 56) to 2021 (N = 29). Fentanyl AEs showed no trend year to year. Table 1: FAERs AEs and deaths with opioids and with concomitant HCV DAAs. (Table Presented) *N represents the sum of fentanyl, oxycodone, and hydrocodone overdose AEs and deaths, whereas n’s for DAA overdose AEs and deaths are irrespective of concomitant opioids. Conclusion: With the limitations of FAERS data (under or duplicate reporting, inability to establish causation or incidence), these data showthat among ~58, 000 fentanyl, ~189, 000 oxycodone, and ~100, 000 hydrocodone AEs reported to FAERS since 2017, a small proportion (0.19%) have been reported in association with concomitant DAA therapy, with no association between recorded events and a specific DAA regimen. This should reassure HCV treaters on a lack of safety signal for concomitant opioid and DAA use.

Treating children with HCV close to home through a virtual national multidisciplinary network

Background and aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health problem in adults & children. The recent efficacy of Direct Acting Anti-viral therapy (DAA) has cure rates of 99% in adults and adolescents. These drugs were licensed for children 3–12 yrs during the recent coronavirus pandemic. To ensure equitable access, safe & convenient supply during lockdown, we established a virtual national treatment pathway for children with HCV in England & evaluated its feasibility, efficacy & treatment outcomes. Method: A paediatric Multidisciplinary Team Operational Delivery Network (pMDT ODN), supported by NHS England (NHSE), was established with relevant paediatric specialists to provide a single point of contact for referrals & information. Referral & treatment protocolswere agreed for HCV therapy approved byMHRA& EMA. On referral the pMDT ODN agreed the most appropriate DAA therapy based on clinical presentation & patient preferences, including ability to swallow tablets. Treatment was prescribed in association with the local paediatrician & pharmacist, without the need for children & families to travel to national centres. All children were eligible for NHS funded therapy;referral centres were approved by the pMDT ODN to dispense medication;funding was reimbursed via a national NHSE agreement. Demographic & clinical data, treatment outcomes & SVR 12 were collected. Feedback on feasibility & satisfaction on the pathway was sought from referrers. Results: In the first 6 months, 34 childrenwere referred;30- England;4-Wales;median (range) age 10 (3.9–14.5) yrs;15M;19F: Most were genotype type 1 (17) & 3 (12);2 (1);4 (4). Co-morbidities included: obesity (2);cardiac anomaly (1);Cystic Fibrosis (1);Juvenile Arthritis (1). No child had cirrhosis. DAA therapy prescribed: Harvoni (21);Epclusa (11);Maviret (2). 27/34 could swallow tablets;3/7 received training to swallowtablets;4/7 are awaiting release of granules.11/27 have completed treatment and cleared virus;of these 7/11 to date achieved SVR 12. 30 children requiring DAA granule formulation are awaiting referral and treatment. Referrers found the virtual process easy to access, valuing opportunity to discuss their patient’s therapy with the MDT & many found it educational. There were difficulties in providing the medication through the local pharmacy. However there are manufacturing delays in providing granule formulations because suppliers focused on treatments for COVID, leading to delays in referring and treating children unable to swallow tablets. Conclusion: The National HCV pMDT ODN delivers high quality treatment & equity of access for children & young people, 3–18 yrs with HCV in England, ensuring they receive care close to home with 100% cure rates.

Prescrire's ratings of new drugs in 2021: A brief review

Three new drugs, all based on messenger RNA or small interfering RNA technology, represented a major therapeutic advance in 2021. But the bigger picture is that most of the new authorisations that advanced patient care were adaptations of existing drugs. And that more than half of this year's new authorisations were not advances, and in fact about one-tenth represented a step backwards compared to existing options.

Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in combination or nitazoxanide alone are safe and efficient treatments for COVID-19 infection: A randomized controlled trial for repurposing antivirals.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Currently, there is no therapy approved for COVID-19. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial included one hundred and ninety patients with non-severe COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomized into three groups. All groups received standard care treatment (SCT). In addition, group 1 received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and group 2 received nitazoxanide. Follow-up by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done at intervals of 5, 8, 11, and 14 days. The primary endpoint was viral clearance. RESULTS: Viral clearance was significantly higher in the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide groups compared to the SCT group in all follow-up intervals (p < 0.001). In the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir arm, 36.9% showed early viral clearance by day 5. By day 14, 83.1% of the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir group, 39.7% of the nitazoxanide group, and 19.4% of the SCT group tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide treatment were the only significant factors in Cox regression of negative RT-PCR with the highest OR (17.88, 95% CI: 6.66-47.98 and 2.59, 95% CI: 1.11-6.07, respectively). No mortality or serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: The addition of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or nitazoxanide to the SCT results in an early and high viral clearance rate in mild and moderate patients with COVID-19. These drugs represent a safe and affordable treatment for COVID-19.

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Ledipasvir in Egyptian patients with COVID-19 compared to standard treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which is an RNA virus similar to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the replication process. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is an approved drug to treat HCV infection. This study investigates the efficacy of Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir as a treatment for patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. This is a single-blinded parallel-randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomized equally into the intervention group that received Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (S.L. group), and the control group received Oseltamivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin (OCH group). The primary outcomes were the cure rate over time and the incidence of serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the laboratory findings. 250 patients were divided equally into each group. Both groups were similar regarding gender, but age was higher in the S.L. group (p=0.001). In the S.L. group, 89 (71.2%) patients were cured, while only 51 (40.8%) patients were cured in the OCH group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the S.L. group (RR=1.75, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meir plot showed a considerably higher cure over time in the S.L. group (Log-rank test, p=0.032). There were no deaths in the S.L. group, but there were six deaths (4.8%) in the OCH group (RR=0.08, p=0.013). Seven patients (5.6%) in the S.L. group and six patients (4.8%) in the OCH group were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (RR=1.17, P=0.776). There were no significant differences between treatment groups regarding total leukocyte and neutrophils count, lymph, and urea. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is suggestive of being effective in treating patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to compare Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with new treatment protocols.

Innovative derivative/zero ratio spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir: Application to average content and uniformity of dosage units.

An innovative simple, rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method was developed for the simultaneous analysis of sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LED) in their combined dosage forms. Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir (SOF/LED) as a combined dosage form was tried at the pandemic COVID 19 crisis. This technique has the advantages of both zero order and first order spectrophotometry. The zero and first derivative amplitudes were measured at 274.2 nm for SOF (zero crossing point of LED in first derivative spectrum) and 314 nm for LED (zero crossing point of SOF in first derivative spectrum) over the concentration range of 2.0-50.0 µg mL-1 with coefficients of determination (R2) > 0.9999 for both drugs and mean percentage recoveries of 100.25 ± 1.61 and 99.85 ± 0.99 for SOF and LED; respectively. This original method was validated according to ICH requirements and statistically compared to published comparison methods. This method was applied to estimate the average content and the uniformity of dosage units of SOF/LED combined dosage form according to British Pharmacopeia requirements.

Remdesivir and Ledipasvir among the FDA-Approved Antiviral Drugs Have Potential to Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Replication.

The rapid spread of the virus, the surge in the number of deaths, and the unavailability of specific SARS-CoV-2 drugs thus far necessitate the identification of drugs with anti-COVID-19 activity. SARS-CoV-2 enters the host cell and assembles a multisubunit RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex of viral nonstructural proteins that plays a substantial role in the transcription and replication of the viral genome. Therefore, RdRp is among the most suitable targets in RNA viruses. Our aim was to investigate the FDA approved antiviral drugs having potential to inhibit the viral replication. The methodology adopted was virtual screening and docking of FDA-approved antiviral drugs into the RdRp protein. Top hits were selected and subjected to molecular dynamics simulations to understand the dynamics of RdRp in complex with these drugs. The antiviral activity of the drugs against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed in Vero E6 cells. Notably, both remdesivir (half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) 6.6 µM, 50% cytotoxicity concentration (CC50) > 100 µM, selectivity index (SI) = 15) and ledipasvir (EC50 34.6 µM, CC50 > 100 µM, SI > 2.9) exerted antiviral action. This study highlights the use of direct-acting antiviral drugs, alone or in combination, for better treatments of COVID-19.

Combined use of the hepatitis C drugs and amentoflavone could interfere with binding of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2: the results of a molecular simulation study.

The worldwide rapid spread of the COVID-19 disease necessitates the search for fast and effective treatments. The repurposing of existing drugs seems to be the best solution in this situation. In this study, the molecular docking method was used to test 248 drugs against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2, which is responsible for viral entry into the host cell. Among the top-ranked ligands are drugs that are used for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments (paritaprevir, ledipasvir, simeprevir) and a natural biflavonoid amentoflavone. The binding sites of the HCV drugs and amentoflavone are different. Therefore, the ternary complexes of the HCV drug, amentoflavone, and RBD can be created. For the 5 top-ranked ligands, the validating molecular dynamics simulations of binary and ternary complexes with RBD were performed. According to the MMPBSA-binding free energies, the HCV drugs ledipasvir and paritaprevir (in a neutral form) are the most efficient binders of the RBD when used in combination with amentoflavone.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Prediction of the SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) 3C-like protease (3CL pro) structure: virtual screening reveals velpatasvir, ledipasvir, and other drug repurposing candidates.

We prepared the three-dimensional model of the SARS-CoV-2 (aka 2019-nCoV) 3C-like protease (3CL pro) using the crystal structure of the highly similar (96% identity) ortholog from the SARS-CoV. All residues involved in the catalysis, substrate binding and dimerisation are 100% conserved. Comparison of the polyprotein PP1AB sequences showed 86% identity. The 3C-like cleavage sites on the coronaviral polyproteins are highly conserved. Based on the near-identical substrate specificities and high sequence identities, we are of the opinion that some of the previous progress of specific inhibitors development for the SARS-CoV enzyme can be conferred on its SARS-CoV-2 counterpart.  With the 3CL pro molecular model, we performed virtual screening for purchasable drugs and proposed 16 candidates for consideration. Among these, the antivirals ledipasvir or velpatasvir are particularly attractive as therapeutics to combat the new coronavirus with minimal side effects, commonly fatigue and headache.  The drugs Epclusa (velpatasvir/sofosbuvir) and Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) could be very effective owing to their dual inhibitory actions on two viral enzymes.